PolicyShield vs Alternatives¶
How does PolicyShield compare to other AI safety and guardrails tools?
Comparison Matrix¶
| Feature | PolicyShield | Guardrails AI | NeMo Guardrails | LlamaGuard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Tool-call firewall | I/O validation | Conversation rails | Content safety |
| What it guards | Tool arguments & execution | LLM input/output text | Conversation flow | Prompts & responses |
| Enforcement point | Between LLM decision and tool execution | Before/after LLM call | Inside conversation pipeline | At inference time |
| Rules format | YAML (declarative) | Python (validators) | Colang (DSL) | Model-based (fine-tuned LLM) |
| Latency overhead | <5ms p99 | 10-100ms+ | 50-500ms+ (LLM call) | 100-1000ms+ (inference) |
| PII detection | ✅ Regex + custom patterns | ✅ Validators | ❌ Not built-in | ❌ Not built-in |
| PII redaction | ✅ In tool arguments | ✅ In text | ❌ | ❌ |
| Tool call blocking | ✅ Core feature | ❌ Not applicable | ⚠️ Via canonical forms | ❌ |
| Human approval | ✅ APPROVE verdict (Telegram, REST) | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Rate limiting | ✅ Per-tool, per-session | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Audit trail | ✅ JSONL + OTEL + Prometheus | ❌ | ⚠️ Basic logging | ❌ |
| Hot reload | ✅ File watcher | ❌ Requires restart | ❌ Requires restart | ❌ N/A |
| Framework-agnostic | ✅ Any framework via HTTP | ⚠️ Python only | ⚠️ Python only | ⚠️ Requires model serving |
| OpenClaw integration | ✅ Native plugin | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Requires GPU | ❌ Pure CPU | ❌ | ⚠️ For LLM-based rails | ✅ |
When to Use PolicyShield¶
✅ Use PolicyShield when:
- Your AI agent calls tools with side effects (shell, file I/O, network, messaging)
- You need to enforce policies on what the agent does, not just what it says
- You want declarative YAML rules, not Python code for security policy
- You need human-in-the-loop approval for sensitive operations
- You need <5ms latency (no LLM in the policy loop)
- You use OpenClaw and want a native plugin
❌ Use something else when:
- You need to guard LLM text output quality (→ Guardrails AI)
- You need conversation flow control (→ NeMo Guardrails)
- You need content safety classification (→ LlamaGuard, OpenAI Moderation)
- You need prompt injection detection at the LLM input level (→ Rebuff, Prompt Guard)
Complementary Tools¶
PolicyShield works alongside other safety tools, not instead of them:
User prompt → [Prompt Guard] → LLM → [NeMo Rails] → tool_call decision
│
[PolicyShield] ← enforcement layer
│
tool execution
│
[Guardrails AI] ← output validation
│
response to user
Each tool covers a different layer. PolicyShield covers the gap between "the LLM decided to call a tool" and "the tool actually executes."